Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
Jun 28, 2016 at 3:33 comment added user45941 Relevant: meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/7990/45941
Feb 15, 2016 at 5:03 history tweeted twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/699096603450306560
Feb 13, 2016 at 2:30 comment added user30594 @MartinButtner : ​ stackoverflow.com/q/2658601/380772 ​ ​ ​ ​
Feb 11, 2016 at 18:01 history edited orlp CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:53 comment added orlp @MartinBüttner I'm talking about finding a specific failing input.
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:51 comment added Martin Ender Mod I guess there's also a difference between requiring proof for incorrectness and requiring a constructive proof. (It shouldn't be hard to prove that there is an infinite amount of strings hashing to any finite-length hexdigest, so it's easy to prove that the above program doesn't work, but finding a specific failing input is likely impossible.)
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:49 comment added Doorknob Mod Surprisingly relevant: codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/1587/3808
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:40 answer added AdmBorkBork timeline score: 26
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:36 answer added PhiNotPi timeline score: 3
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:29 comment added Rainbolt What do you mean by "allowed"? Do you mean "eligible for deletion" or "eligible for downvotes" or something else entirely?
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:29 comment added undergroundmonorail on one hand, i don't think your example should be allowed. on the other hand, i don't mind probabilistic primality tests... yeah, this contradiction probably means we need policy on this :P
Feb 11, 2016 at 17:24 history asked orlp CC BY-SA 3.0