Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack Exchange
Stack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack InternalMy suggestion is that we assume a program is correct until someone finds an explicit input/output pair for which it fails.
I believe this is the most clear-cut, objective way to determine whether or not an answer is correct.
(Edit: this answer is regarding whether or not they should be deleted"allowed" as "not deleted" instead of "not downvoted")
My suggestion is that we assume a program is correct until someone finds an explicit input/output pair for which it fails.
I believe this is the most clear-cut, objective way to determine whether or not an answer is correct.
(Edit: this answer is regarding whether or not they should be deleted)
My suggestion is that we assume a program is correct until someone finds an explicit input/output pair for which it fails.
I believe this is the most clear-cut, objective way to determine whether or not an answer is correct.
(Edit: this answer is regarding "allowed" as "not deleted" instead of "not downvoted")
My suggestion is that we assume a program is correct until someone finds an explicit input/output pair for which it fails.
I believe this is the most clear-cut, objective way to determine whether or not an answer is correct.
(Edit: this answer is regarding whether or not they should be deleted)
