Skip to main content
added 177 characters in body
Source Link
Alex L
  • 5.8k
  • 11
  • 11

Agreed, the following are points that should already be taken care of in answers. Even if the OP specifies one point of interest, it's reasonable to take care of them all.

Burn:


It's hard to have an opinion on and because both are acceptable descriptions of a question. However, do they carry the weight of having their own tags?

seems like something OPs already add in their question without hesitation (as to make sure responses aren't too harsh or complicated).

is useful, simply so the fuss of deciding whether the OP knows of the language functionality is eliminated.

Update: I see what's being said about . Since I'm not actively involved with that tag, I was misled and retract my desire to destroy it. Maybe I'm a pyro...

Agreed, the following are points that should already be taken care of in answers. Even if the OP specifies one point of interest, it's reasonable to take care of them all.

Burn:


It's hard to have an opinion on and because both are acceptable descriptions of a question. However, do they carry the weight of having their own tags?

seems like something OPs already add in their question without hesitation (as to make sure responses aren't too harsh or complicated).

is useful, simply so the fuss of deciding whether the OP knows of the language functionality is eliminated.

Agreed, the following are points that should already be taken care of in answers. Even if the OP specifies one point of interest, it's reasonable to take care of them all.

Burn:


It's hard to have an opinion on and because both are acceptable descriptions of a question. However, do they carry the weight of having their own tags?

seems like something OPs already add in their question without hesitation (as to make sure responses aren't too harsh or complicated).

is useful, simply so the fuss of deciding whether the OP knows of the language functionality is eliminated.

Update: I see what's being said about . Since I'm not actively involved with that tag, I was misled and retract my desire to destroy it. Maybe I'm a pyro...

deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Jamal Mod
  • 35.2k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 106

Agreed, the following are points that should already be taken care of in answers. Even if the OP specifies one point of interest, it's reasonable to take care of them all.

Burn:


It's hard to have an opinion on and because both are acceptable descriptions of a question. However, do they carry the weight of having their own tags?

seems like something OPs already add in their question without hesitation (as to make sure responses aren't totoo harsh or complicated).

is useful, simply so the fuss of deciding whether the OP knows of the language functionality is eliminated.

Agreed, the following are points that should already be taken care of in answers. Even if the OP specifies one point of interest, it's reasonable to take care of them all.

Burn:


It's hard to have an opinion on and because both are acceptable descriptions of a question. However, do they carry the weight of having their own tags?

seems like something OPs already add in their question without hesitation (as to make sure responses aren't to harsh or complicated).

is useful, simply so the fuss of deciding whether the OP knows of the language functionality is eliminated.

Agreed, the following are points that should already be taken care of in answers. Even if the OP specifies one point of interest, it's reasonable to take care of them all.

Burn:


It's hard to have an opinion on and because both are acceptable descriptions of a question. However, do they carry the weight of having their own tags?

seems like something OPs already add in their question without hesitation (as to make sure responses aren't too harsh or complicated).

is useful, simply so the fuss of deciding whether the OP knows of the language functionality is eliminated.

Source Link
Alex L
  • 5.8k
  • 11
  • 11

Agreed, the following are points that should already be taken care of in answers. Even if the OP specifies one point of interest, it's reasonable to take care of them all.

Burn:


It's hard to have an opinion on and because both are acceptable descriptions of a question. However, do they carry the weight of having their own tags?

seems like something OPs already add in their question without hesitation (as to make sure responses aren't to harsh or complicated).

is useful, simply so the fuss of deciding whether the OP knows of the language functionality is eliminated.