Timeline for "Enough reviewable code"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 21:55 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/493877531058388992 | ||
| Jul 26, 2014 at 2:13 | comment | added | nhgrif | Though this doesn't even necessarily have to mean posting more code. If he narrowed the posted code down to just FirstViewController.h/FirstViewController.m, it'd be on-topic from my point of view. | |
| Jul 26, 2014 at 2:11 | comment | added | nhgrif | And actually, I do agree that this question could easily be made on-topic by changing the amount of code in the question. That's why the question is on hold and not deleted. The question is on hold given the asker opportunity to improve the question, and if the asker fails to do so, the question will be deleted. | |
| Jul 26, 2014 at 2:08 | comment | added | nhgrif | I made no comment on whether or not it'd be on-topic on SO as it's irrelevant. I only commented that I wouldn't have recommended it be migrated from SO to CR as it'd be off-topic here. | |
| Jul 26, 2014 at 1:07 | comment | added | CrimsonChris | Wouldn't this be off-topic in StackOverflow as well since the primary question asked is "how do I improve this code"? The OP implies that their code works, they are likely just unsure how much of their code to share. Seems like the question could be made on topic by simply providing the missing code. | |
| Jul 26, 2014 at 0:00 | vote | accept | nhgrif | ||
| Jul 25, 2014 at 23:40 | history | edited | nhgrif | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1019 characters in body |
| Jul 25, 2014 at 23:33 | answer | added | 200_successMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jul 25, 2014 at 23:29 | history | asked | nhgrif | CC BY-SA 3.0 |