Timeline for Should we do anything with this multi-part answer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2018 at 21:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/1031647577874288646 | ||
| Aug 20, 2018 at 19:27 | comment | added | MCG | @Loganf question has been asked | |
| Aug 20, 2018 at 18:53 | comment | added | MCG | @Loganf and pipe, righto, I'll do a different meta question | |
| Aug 20, 2018 at 18:32 | comment | added | pipe | @MCG Have to agree with Loganf here, it should be a different meta-question. | |
| Aug 20, 2018 at 18:30 | comment | added | Loganf | @MCG I have posted one of the answers you reference here, and I would normally agree with you but in this case its clearly not that common a practise so all the answers are going to be conjecture without an actual samsung employee responding. I think "other mfrs do this because of x, maybe samsung do as well" holds about as much weight as a reason which has no examples but stands up to scrutiny from experienced engineers. Perhaps this should be its own meta question? | |
| Aug 20, 2018 at 14:51 | comment | added | MCG | Also on the same questions are a few answers that start with 'I think' or, 'this is my guess'. To me, these answers should not be allowed either. Answers are supposed to be answers. If you are going to have a guess, then to me, it should be backed up with some examples, links or something similar. Or is that just me? | |
| Aug 20, 2018 at 0:28 | answer | added | Passerby | timeline score: -3 | |
| Aug 19, 2018 at 15:50 | vote | accept | pipe | ||
| Aug 19, 2018 at 20:18 | |||||
| Aug 19, 2018 at 13:11 | answer | added | Darius | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 19, 2018 at 11:09 | answer | added | Dave TweedMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 19, 2018 at 6:51 | history | asked | pipe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |