Skip to main content
Software Engineering

Return to Answer

replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.

Period.

Yes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I build my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describe it with.

"Removing" my answer as the researchthe research doesn't indicate it would provide any benefit.

Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.

Period.

Yes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I build my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describe it with.

"Removing" my answer as the research doesn't indicate it would provide any benefit.

Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.

Period.

Yes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I build my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describe it with.

"Removing" my answer as the research doesn't indicate it would provide any benefit.

added 160 characters in body
Source Link
user53019
user53019

Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.

Period.Period.

Yes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I buildYes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I build my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describe it with.

"Removing" my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describeanswer as the research doesn't indicate it withwould provide any benefit.

Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.

Period.

Yes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I build my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describe it with.

Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.

Period.

Yes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I build my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describe it with.

"Removing" my answer as the research doesn't indicate it would provide any benefit.

Source Link
user53019
user53019

Yes, it's worth the effort to tighten whatever quality mechanisms are in place.

Period.

Yes, we'll probably filter out some otherwise decent questions that way. That's a price I'm willing to pay to filter out crap questions like "how do I build my own beginner's linux distro?" Questions like that make me want to open another meta question to identify the strongest but just-this-side-of-OK-for-Stack-Exchange word to describe it with.