Timeline for Is it time to tighten up the quality filter at Programmers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2013 at 16:47 | comment | added | user53019 | @Shog9 - txtspk should really hurt. | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 3:57 | comment | added | Shog9 StaffMod | FWIW, lack of proper capitalization does factor in, but it won't by itself block a question. If your question is borderline already and you forget to capitalize your "i", then that might just block it. txtspk also hurts. | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 21:21 | comment | added | gnat | don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind voting and editing, if (note: if) it turns out that tweaking the filter doesn't make sense | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 20:16 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | I am reminded of the folks at Meta.SO who are always asking for certain tags or words to be blacklisted. It's a bottomless pit; there are always side-effects, and users always find ways to work around the pr0blem [sic]. | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 20:05 | comment | added | gnat | well I am really confused with word "itself". Other than that, I agree that problem is solved (by 20 DVs, 6 VtC and 3 mod-deletes). As for abdicating, we already do, don't we? I mean, quality filter is already in action, we only discuss whether to tweak its settings | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 19:59 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | @gnat: This person won't be posting questions again. Problem solved. Don't abdicate your moderation responsibilities to a machine. | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 19:54 | comment | added | gnat | "problem has already solved itself" - how's that? Let's see, 7+7+6=20 votes down, 2+1+3=6 votes to close, 3 mod-deletes, does this qualify as solved itself? | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 19:44 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 228 characters in body |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 19:38 | history | answered | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |