Timeline for Don't signal your edits in text
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Apr 13, 2014 at 13:55 | comment | added | Marc Dingena | That makes sense. I understand | |
| Apr 13, 2014 at 11:01 | comment | added | Wibbs | that works for new questions but not for new answers to old questions | |
| Apr 12, 2014 at 7:09 | comment | added | Marc Dingena | If you need to see new content, can't you use the newest-sorting instead? | |
| Apr 12, 2014 at 0:53 | comment | added | BESW | Great work, but in the future try not to do too many at once; it can push actual new content off the "active" page. Spacing it out over a longer time is more onerous, but helps keep new content visible. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 17:20 | comment | added | Cristol.GdM | If deleting a comment poiting out something which was then added as an edit to the question, maybe add a note in the answer: "as pointed out by [thatuser]", or just "(credits to [thatuser])". Making it seem like it was the answerer original idea somehow doesn't seem right | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 16:09 | comment | added | Marc Dingena | It's like you read my mind. I just asked this question. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 16:07 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | Oh, a request: when you're editing out the "edit:" notes, can you take a few extra seconds to glance over the comments and see if they're obsolete (now answered by the question, etc.)? If so, flagging the first now-obsolete comment is plenty to signal a mod that they can all be cleaned up. Obsolete comments and old "edit:" notes co-occur a lot. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 16:02 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | When you suggest an edit it enters a queue for suggested edits review that 2k+ rep users can access. (There's also a couple of queues you get access to at 500 rep.) | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 15:47 | comment | added | Marc Dingena | Where can I find this review queue? | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 15:45 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | No, I have no objections! You're doing good work already, I can see from the review queue. :) That was just a comment on the sheer quantity; I hadn't realised it was so out of hand. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 15:44 | comment | added | Marc Dingena | I think taking high-scoring, older and/or traffic-generating posts should be given priority in this little cleanup. The above search-and-sorts was the quickest method of getting a list like that. If you have any other priority lists please add them. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 15:42 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | Yeah... This often happens in the course of helping a new asker clarify their question (since new askers are more likely to use "edit:" syntax), and there's a natural tendency to avoid minor edits when it's already being edited a lot. And then it falls off the front page and gets forgotten about. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 12:25 | comment | added | Marc Dingena | Only 586 results! Woop | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 12:24 | history | answered | Marc Dingena | CC BY-SA 3.0 |