Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 1
    +1 for linking to better sources. Instead of slinging mud let's just promote the better material. Commented Jan 29, 2012 at 18:49
  • 10
    It was so hard to keep down my deep seated disgust for w3schools while writing this post. Commented Jan 29, 2012 at 18:56
  • 9
    It's all right here in the official W3C specification: [link to w3schools] I've seen the opposite happen as well: someone posts a link to the actual W3C specification, only to have a W3Fools link dropped on them. Commented Jan 29, 2012 at 21:54
  • This answer says everything I can imagine saying about this topic myself. Commented Jan 30, 2012 at 5:22
  • @BilltheLizard: Really? That's a new one to me, I've never once seen that - and I spend most of my time in the HTML/CSS tags. Are you sure it wasn't the w3schools W3C Tutorial? Commented Jan 30, 2012 at 17:05
  • @Madmartigan No, it was definitely a link going to the proper W3C site. It's not a common occurrence at all though. I only remember it because it stood out. Commented Jan 30, 2012 at 17:10