Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotessuccessfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correctfor the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correctfor the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
Flagging link-only answers as "Other" with appropriate "canned" explanation turned out just safer for me.
Works like a charm - eg yesterday, when I successfully flagged an accepted answer having two upvotes.
I also think that for blatant link-only answers moderators should dismiss Not an answer flags as helpful, but for the reasons other than flag being technically correct.
