Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Sep 25, 2021 at 17:06 history bounty ended CommunityBotStaff
S Sep 25, 2021 at 17:06 history notice removed CommunityBotStaff
Sep 20, 2021 at 20:38 comment added gnat this request was also recently submitted as feedback in Review queue workflows - Final release (evaluated status-deferred at the time of posting this comment)
S Sep 17, 2021 at 15:53 history bounty started gnat
S Sep 17, 2021 at 15:53 history notice added gnat Authoritative reference needed
Oct 28, 2019 at 16:25 review Close votes
Oct 28, 2019 at 16:42
Dec 13, 2017 at 16:22 history edited Donald Duck is with Ukraine CC BY-SA 3.0
Stack Exchange has an advanced revision history system: 'Edit' or 'Update' is unnecessary.
May 23, 2017 at 12:36 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
S Nov 2, 2013 at 9:11 history bounty ended Qantas 94 Heavy
S Nov 2, 2013 at 9:11 history notice removed Qantas 94 Heavy
S Oct 26, 2013 at 10:07 history bounty started Qantas 94 Heavy
S Oct 26, 2013 at 10:07 history notice added Qantas 94 Heavy Draw attention
Aug 7, 2013 at 2:51 comment added Austin Henley @ficuscr I know exactly what you mean. In fact, I made a post about the missing username just the other day.
Aug 7, 2013 at 0:01 comment added ficuscr My complaint is with late answers where an existing answer is shown with a User55555 type new (bogus?) author. I looked at the page and thought someone had just copied and pasted the existing good up-voted answer. So I go to flag and get a 'Stop! Look Listen' audit failure.
Jul 16, 2013 at 13:08 comment added Richard Tingle Does the interface behave like this on non audits? (I have only reviewed Questions/Answers without comments so far)
Jul 16, 2013 at 12:59 history edited gnat
As review audit items are [picked automatically](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/168374/165773), there is a chance for some of them to be confusing or misleading...
Jan 3, 2013 at 0:58 vote accept Austin Henley
Dec 11, 2012 at 17:47 vote accept Austin Henley
Dec 31, 2012 at 20:10
Nov 30, 2012 at 8:15 history edited gnat
edited tags
Nov 28, 2012 at 7:30 history edited Geoff DalgasStaffMod
edited tags
Nov 28, 2012 at 7:02 answer added Geoff DalgasStaffMod timeline score: 4
Nov 28, 2012 at 7:02 answer added gnat timeline score: 104
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:50 history edited Austin Henley CC BY-SA 3.0
added 382 characters in body
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:26 history edited Adam LearStaffMod
edited tags
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:23 comment added user50049 @AustinHenley You're right, (I did say ICBW) - I was trying to reproduce in the wrong queue.
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:20 comment added Austin Henley @TimPost Wrong, you CAN up vote comments through review. Also, it did not give me the ability to undo the up vote so how is it realistic in any way? It isn't like I clicked "I'm Done"
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:19 comment added user50049 You took precisely the action the interface was programmed to dislike .. I'm not sure how that could be done any differently? As far as I know you can't up vote comments through review (at all), I don't believe it's a giveaway. Checking on that though, ICBW.
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:04 comment added Austin Henley @animuson I was clicking anything to check if the interface was working. I thought my browser was misbehaving.
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:03 comment added animuson StaffMod Why would you choose to click the upvote button rather than the downvote button?
Nov 28, 2012 at 6:03 history edited Austin Henley CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Nov 28, 2012 at 5:57 history asked Austin Henley CC BY-SA 3.0