Timeline for <kbd> elements are way too intrusive
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2022 at 22:11 | history | edited | Michael come lately | CC BY-SA 4.0 | CSS Prettyprint |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 19:18 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by LauraStaffMod | ||
| Jul 15, 2014 at 15:30 | comment | added | Werner | @dbr: Not on TeX - LaTeX where I contribute mostly. | |
| Jul 15, 2014 at 13:51 | comment | added | dbr | @Werner It would be very easy to do with the "Stylish" addon for Chrome/Firefox. Also definitely doable with Tampermonkey, you'd just need to inject the CSS via Javascript (searching for "tampermonkey add css" should find something).. but in this specific case, why do you need to? The site has been updated to make the kdb element much nicer | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 20:39 | comment | added | Werner | Is this something one can run using Tampermonkey as a script to override the default <kbd>...</kbd> specification? If so, how do you go about doing that? | |
| S Jul 12, 2014 at 6:38 | history | suggested | Werner | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Re-embedded image (found on Wayback Machine). |
| Jul 12, 2014 at 6:28 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 12, 2014 at 6:38 | |||||
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Migration of MSO links to MSE links | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 2:54 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Added cross reference, etc. |
| Feb 12, 2012 at 19:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 12, 2012 at 19:11 | |||||
| Nov 27, 2010 at 3:56 | history | edited | dbr | CC BY-SA 2.5 | Typo |
| Jul 8, 2009 at 1:54 | vote | accept | Paul Fisher | ||
| Jul 3, 2009 at 10:23 | comment | added | Richard | +1: Seems to be the default padding in the SO CSS that is the problem. BUt changing it would probably destroy most of the answers here :-) | |
| Jul 3, 2009 at 1:09 | history | answered | dbr | CC BY-SA 2.5 |