Timeline for What guidance should be given when edits are rejected?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 12:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://data.stackexchange.com/ with https://data.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Jan 18, 2021 at 11:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Jul 6, 2015 at 23:46 | answer | added | Halil Sen | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 25, 2014 at 23:46 | answer | added | apaul | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 24, 2014 at 22:49 | answer | added | Shog9StaffMod | timeline score: 28 | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 14:31 | comment | added | Shog9 StaffMod | The rationale is given here, @TylerH - I'm not interested in debating it here, as it is part of a larger problem. The rest of the rejection reasons have some issues as well, but I do believe they can be salvaged / augmented / replaced. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 13:25 | comment | added | TylerH | I read this post and I still don't see a reason for removing the "Too Minor" rejection option, other than "I want to remove it", which is no reason at all. I also disagree with all the other suggested changes to the appropriate use of each of the remaining options, without an array of alternatives already put forward to replace the lost "choices" that were used more than any of the choices that have remained. I do not like such unanticipated, unilateral action. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 13:22 | comment | added | TylerH | @tchrist Ignorance of the law is not an excuse. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 3:30 | comment | added | user213963 | Elsewhere you made a comment about "Under X characters, where X is between 6 and 600?" --- It is still necessary for non-2k users to make edits of a 'substantial' nature (see for example, fixing a typo of 'now' to 'know' and 'it's' to 'its' programmers.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/76440 ). It is disappointing to need to approve such other rewordings to actually see the improvement in the post. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 2:32 | history | edited | Jonathan Leffler | CC BY-SA 3.0 | moreso --> more so |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 23:40 | answer | added | bjb568 | timeline score: 14 | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 22:42 | comment | added | Braiam | This is live, right? | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 19:43 | comment | added | Shog9 StaffMod | I suspect most of us have, @Barmar. | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 19:42 | comment | added | Barmar | I don't agree with the way you're talking about replacing "too minor". Sometimes I consider the original post good enough, the only problem is minor spelling or grammar problems. I don't see the need for an alternate edit, I think the question can be left as is. That's why I currently reject the edit as too minor. Have I been on the Internet too long, so I've become accustomed to crappy writing? | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 4:17 | comment | added | bjb568 | @tchtist Ignorance is the problem we're trying to solve here... | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 3:34 | comment | added | tchrist | @bjb568 Approvers of plagiarism should get a penalty? Can’t they plead ignorance of the law? | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 1:02 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 13 | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 0:23 | comment | added | bjb568 | @random The submitter and approvers of plagiarism should have a reputation penalty, after mixed plagiarism/approve go to a mod queue to confirm. | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 0:18 | comment | added | tchrist | You mention “in favor of being implicitly chosen by the system”; does the system currently have a set of criteria for this (other than too short), or would you be adding a new facility for it to do so, or would you just be enhancing the auto-detector in some fashion? | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 0:16 | comment | added | Braiam | @random ... by people that don't even check. | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 0:05 | comment | added | random | "copied content" gets used less because by the time you check and choose it it's already been approved | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 0:03 | answer | added | Adam LearStaffMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 23:47 | history | edited | Shog9StaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 113 characters in body |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 23:41 | history | asked | Shog9StaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |