Timeline for Allow moderators to reverse and/or nullify flag decisions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2019 at 4:02 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | @DanDascalescu Yes, there is a two-week waiting period if you've voted to close but it's aged. This is to prevent people from frivolously repeatedly adding the same question to CV review. | |
| May 19, 2019 at 4:00 | comment | added | Dan Dascalescu | @SonictheInclusiveHedgehog: I get "You have already voted to close this question, but you may vote again on May 31 at 3:01". So I'm blocked from closing that question with a legitimate one for two weeks? How does this helps SO? If there's hope that I'll set a calendar event or something to waste more time on this issue in two weeks from now, that's very mistaken :) | |
| May 18, 2019 at 8:30 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | Click the "close" button on the post. (By the way, once you have 3k+ rep, close flags remap to close votes.) | |
| May 18, 2019 at 8:03 | comment | added | Zoe - Save the data dump | Please remove the link to your flag summary. It's not visible to non-moderators (and through that, most of the readers of this post) | |
| May 18, 2019 at 7:57 | comment | added | Dan Dascalescu | @SonictheInclusiveHedgehog: I have no idea :) Where can I look to find out? | |
| May 18, 2019 at 7:54 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | Yeah, I see it better now. That said, the screenshot you show here should only be shown if you've cast a close vote that is still pending, led to a successful closure but was later reopened, was retracted, or has aged away less than 14 days ago. Which one of these is the case? | |
| May 18, 2019 at 7:46 | history | edited | Dan Dascalescu | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Highlight new arugments |
| May 18, 2019 at 7:31 | history | answered | Dan Dascalescu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |