Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 2
    Stepping back a bit, what characteristics do you want from an open-source license for which you couldn't find an existing suitable license? In particular in your case, why not just use the Apache License 2.0 as is? Commented Jul 8, 2020 at 16:57
  • I want a very permissive license like BSD or MIT but with a patent license. My main (and only) issue is the requirement of stating changes to licensed code. Commented Jul 8, 2020 at 17:12
  • 8
    Does this answer your question? How can a "crayon" license be a problem? Commented Jul 9, 2020 at 16:04