Timeline for MIT license and "All rights reserved."?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2023 at 9:37 | comment | added | FeRD | @IonicăBizău This one: opensource.stackexchange.com/a/4403/20949 | |
| Jan 12, 2023 at 20:45 | comment | added | Ionică Bizău | @FeRD Sorry, where is that answer? | |
| Jan 11, 2023 at 21:51 | comment | added | FeRD | I don't know if you're even still around anymore, Ionică Bizău, but it'd really be great to see the now-Community Wiki answer originally written by TomDworzanski marked as Accepted. It does a very good job of laying out the reasons why "All rights reserved" is NOT correct, NOT there for clarity, and NOT acceptable in the context of the MIT license (all claims that the currently-accepted answer makes or implies). | |
| May 17, 2017 at 22:49 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | Example: github.com/fchollet/keras/blob/master/LICENSE (mirror) | |
| Aug 31, 2016 at 2:59 | answer | added | user5126 | timeline score: 38 | |
| Nov 22, 2015 at 12:27 | vote | accept | Ionică Bizău | ||
| Nov 22, 2015 at 11:36 | answer | added | ArtOfCode | timeline score: 24 | |
| Nov 22, 2015 at 7:19 | history | asked | Ionică Bizău | CC BY-SA 3.0 |