Timeline for Which software methodology works when you are in learning phase of a technology?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:16 | vote | accept | Huzaifa | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:16 | vote | accept | Huzaifa | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:16 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 3:29 | comment | added | Steven A. Lowe | @Adnan: waterfall yes, agile no - agile explicitly allows for 'spike' projects. | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 2:18 | answer | added | Thomas Owens♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 2:07 | history | edited | Thomas Owens♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 2 characters in body; edited tags; edited title |
| S Sep 12, 2011 at 2:06 | history | suggested | Caffeinated | CC BY-SA 3.0 | fixed spelling, some wording |
| Sep 12, 2011 at 2:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 12, 2011 at 2:06 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 0:36 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Sep 11, 2011 at 23:16 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 9:16 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2011 at 14:12 | answer | added | darlinton | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 11, 2011 at 3:34 | comment | added | TrueWill | If you know all the technical challenges then you aren't in learning phase. Distributed team, unfamiliar technology, mandated up-front design - this sounds like a recipe for failure to me. Something needs to change. | |
| Sep 11, 2011 at 2:51 | answer | added | C0L.PAN1C | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 11, 2011 at 2:48 | comment | added | Adnan Bhatti | Just a student. However based on what I have read in Object oriented Analysis and Design course, waterfall and Agile are POOR methodologies to work with if you are unfamiliar with technology. Throwaway Prototyping is considered the best in these cases. | |
| Sep 11, 2011 at 2:38 | history | asked | Huzaifa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |