Timeline for What can you do to decrease the number of deployment bugs of a live website?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2013 at 20:29 | comment | added | Tulains Córdova | If a deployment fails you have to roll it back. | |
| Sep 14, 2011 at 23:38 | answer | added | blueberryfields | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Sep 13, 2011 at 19:04 | history | suggested | Byrne Reese | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Minor grammatical changes to the title. |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 19:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 13, 2011 at 19:04 | |||||
| Sep 13, 2011 at 19:00 | answer | added | Byrne Reese | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 18:26 | answer | added | Bill Michell | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 14:27 | comment | added | HLGEM | If you haven't figured out everything, you should not be deploying. | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 13:30 | answer | added | Alex Feinman | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 13:01 | comment | added | S.Lott | "The problem with check-lists is that, they should always get updated, but they won't" In that case, you're doomed. We can tell you a good things to do, and -- just like the check-list -- it won't get done. If you can't keep checklists up to date, you should consider finding another kind of job were errors and sloppiness are tolerated better. Perhaps government service. | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 12:49 | answer | added | treecoder | timeline score: 13 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 12:39 | answer | added | BMBM | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 11:44 | answer | added | maple_shaft♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 11:44 | comment | added | Ramhound | You should not be breaking your website when you update it. If you are...then your procedure is wrong. | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 11:11 | answer | added | Tom Squires | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 11:07 | answer | added | Oded | timeline score: 28 | |
| Sep 13, 2011 at 11:04 | history | asked | Saeed Neamati | CC BY-SA 3.0 |