Timeline for Does a project using proper TDD have a lot of code without tests?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2019 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/1158935954100498437 | ||
| Aug 7, 2019 at 2:07 | answer | added | Eric Elliott | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Oct 4, 2011 at 15:31 | comment | added | tdammers | You may have forgotten that you can also unit-test the glue that wires units together - a unit doesn't have to live in a vacuum to be tested; wiring it up against mock classes or simulating whatever ecosystem they need is perfectly fine, as long as the tests test what they should test. | |
| Oct 4, 2011 at 15:14 | vote | accept | Martin Ba | ||
| Oct 4, 2011 at 15:06 | comment | added | Treb | Perhaps the wikipedia quote would be clearer if it was formulated like this: Integration testing takes as its input units that have been unit tested. Yes, module can be interpreted as meaning class or function in this case. | |
| Oct 4, 2011 at 14:47 | history | edited | Martin Ba | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 368 characters in body |
| Oct 4, 2011 at 14:04 | vote | accept | Martin Ba | ||
| Oct 4, 2011 at 14:45 | |||||
| Oct 4, 2011 at 13:13 | answer | added | Thomas Owens♦ | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 4, 2011 at 13:04 | history | asked | Martin Ba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |