Skip to main content

Timeline for How does key-based caching work?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 5, 2015 at 1:24 history protected gnat
S May 23, 2014 at 6:41 history bounty ended Nicole
S May 23, 2014 at 6:41 history notice removed Nicole
May 17, 2014 at 1:36 answer added Izkata timeline score: 3
May 16, 2014 at 12:44 comment added Izkata It looks like your code snippet has a typo - was post.body intended to be comment.body?
S May 16, 2014 at 2:44 history bounty started Nicole
S May 16, 2014 at 2:44 history notice added Nicole Improve details
Nov 25, 2013 at 17:35 comment added JensG Actually their caching strategy seems a little bit more educated. I recommend this article as well: 37signals.com/svn/posts/…
May 24, 2012 at 20:15 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/205753833840836608
Mar 13, 2012 at 10:29 comment added vdboor That's true, an also happens with the 37signals code, it is focussed on the rendering code. The trick is to cache the whole list in another container too, or cache the retrieval of the object elsewhere.
Mar 13, 2012 at 9:11 comment added Dominic Santos I already had a look at that and that seems to suffer from exactly the same problem. The data he's trying to cache is required in order to access the cache. The only thing he seems to be saving on is in the inner expensive operation which is unlike most use cases for this type of caching.
Mar 8, 2012 at 16:10 comment added vdboor Take a look at rossp.org/blog/2012/feb/29/fragment-caching for a Django example!
Mar 3, 2012 at 1:33 answer added ilvar timeline score: -2
Mar 2, 2012 at 10:48 review Suggested edits
Mar 2, 2012 at 10:59
Mar 2, 2012 at 10:47 history edited yannis CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Mar 2, 2012 at 10:43 history asked Dominic Santos CC BY-SA 3.0