Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 11, 2010 at 20:06 comment added Roger Pate @g.f: If you want to edit it that way without the redundancy (e.g. not "A: Blah. -- A", but "A: Blah."), I wouldn't revert it, but I think it's fine like this too.
Oct 11, 2010 at 19:29 comment added g.f @Roger: In this case it takes away part of the intent for me: "A: Even if A".
Oct 11, 2010 at 17:43 history edited Roger Pate CC BY-SA 2.5
no need to give the source twice (before and afterwards)
Oct 11, 2010 at 17:43 comment added Roger Pate @g.f: When it's transformed into defining the source afterwards (with a dash), the leading introduction isn't warranted ("A: Blah." -> "Blah. -- A"). This isn't removing part of the quote.
Oct 11, 2010 at 16:09 comment added Peter Turner +1 - I'm proud to count myself among the top billion programmers along with Douglas Hofstadter.
Sep 27, 2010 at 15:40 history edited g.f CC BY-SA 2.5
Why the hell do people remove part of the quote?; added 18 characters in body
Sep 27, 2010 at 14:43 history edited Tamara Wijsman CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 7 characters in body
Sep 22, 2010 at 18:02 comment added mouviciel It may converge for sufficient small values of "longer"
Sep 22, 2010 at 4:08 comment added Jon Purdy @Joe D: I'm curious how you'd rewrite a recursive English sentence into a single non-recursive sentence.
Sep 10, 2010 at 13:40 history edited Peter Coulton CC BY-SA 2.5
added 18 characters in body
Sep 10, 2010 at 8:56 history edited P Shved CC BY-SA 2.5
rolled back. Who I am to decide?..
Sep 8, 2010 at 22:30 history edited Roger Pate CC BY-SA 2.5
don't need double quotes within a blockquote
Sep 4, 2010 at 10:57 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki
Sep 2, 2010 at 1:45 comment added Nathan Taylor Brain stack overflow.
Sep 1, 2010 at 20:40 history answered nivlam CC BY-SA 2.5