Timeline for Is dynamic HTML layout good from an SEO perspective?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2022 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/1488527566982033416 | ||
| Apr 13, 2012 at 20:29 | comment | added | sll | @Izkata: so generally saying dynamically built sites less optimal from SEO perspective? | |
| Apr 13, 2012 at 3:43 | answer | added | Erik Reppen | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 13, 2012 at 3:23 | comment | added | Izkata | @sll That's right. Google has taken extra measures to capture some AJAX content if the developers take the right steps, as Robet posted in his answer, but in general the HTML seen from the "View Source" option in the browser is all that search engines will see. | |
| Apr 12, 2012 at 20:23 | vote | accept | sll | ||
| Apr 12, 2012 at 20:15 | answer | added | Rodolfo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 12, 2012 at 19:53 | answer | added | Robert Harvey | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 12, 2012 at 19:46 | comment | added | sll | @RobertHarvey: interesting I though that they using source of a page which I see when opening a page source in a browser | |
| Apr 12, 2012 at 19:45 | comment | added | sll | @Ryathal : thanks for fixing grammar in the title, I still need working hard on my English grammar | |
| Apr 12, 2012 at 19:39 | history | edited | Ryathal | CC BY-SA 3.0 | better english in title |
| Apr 12, 2012 at 19:30 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | how search bots would parse such content? -- The same way they parse an ordinary HTML page... They parse the rendered page. | |
| Apr 12, 2012 at 19:27 | history | asked | sll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |