Timeline for Why aren't there other programming languages that compile to Python bytecode?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2014 at 3:12 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Sep 4, 2014 at 3:53 | |||||
| May 17, 2012 at 5:46 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 3 characters in body |
| May 17, 2012 at 5:35 | comment | added | yannis | @RobertHarvey Ninja edited that. Although I don't think of "access to fancy new toys" as a technical reason (not that the toys aren't great), the wiki also mentions that IronPython is easier to extend. | |
| May 17, 2012 at 5:27 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | @YannisRizos: Surely access to the .NET framework is not entirely inconsequential. Of course, it's possible that CPython users might be completely uninterested in that. | |
| May 17, 2012 at 1:26 | comment | added | yannis | "GIL free" is one of the technical reasons mentioned on "Reasons that CPython programmers might be interested in IronPython" in the Python wiki. | |
| May 17, 2012 at 1:00 | history | edited | user28988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 193 characters in body |
| May 17, 2012 at 0:47 | history | answered | user28988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |