Timeline for Why do Git users say that Subversion does not have all the source code locally?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2012 at 10:35 | answer | added | linquize | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 21, 2012 at 21:41 | vote | accept | johnny | ||
| Oct 19, 2012 at 23:22 | answer | added | Bryan Oakley | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 19, 2012 at 19:37 | comment | added | stonemetal | It isn't that you have all your source code locally, it is that you have the entire repository history locally. This makes all repository interactions other than server synchronization much faster. | |
| Oct 19, 2012 at 15:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/259308307687280640 | ||
| Oct 19, 2012 at 14:55 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 9 characters in body |
| Oct 19, 2012 at 14:19 | answer | added | David Peterman | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 19, 2012 at 14:13 | answer | added | Amenti | timeline score: 17 | |
| Oct 19, 2012 at 14:11 | answer | added | Goran Jovic | timeline score: 69 | |
| Oct 19, 2012 at 14:07 | history | asked | johnny | CC BY-SA 3.0 |