Timeline for Relative value of manual vs automated testing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 | vote | accept | Simon Martin | ||
| Feb 12, 2013 at 9:38 | comment | added | Simon Martin | @mattnz I appreciate that a full answer would require knowledge of the organisation, the culture, finances etc. but conceptually I would like to know if there is any objective arguments I can use to make the case for more automated testing. | |
| Feb 11, 2013 at 21:45 | comment | added | mattnz | Vote to close - there is not enough information (and probably never can be) about the details of the organization and software to be tested to provide a meaningful answer. Any meaningful answer will likely be too specific for the general community | |
| Feb 11, 2013 at 18:26 | answer | added | Karl Bielefeldt | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 11, 2013 at 17:48 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 11, 2013 at 22:21 | |||||
| Feb 11, 2013 at 17:21 | answer | added | Doc Brown | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 11, 2013 at 17:06 | answer | added | joshin4colours | timeline score: 14 | |
| Feb 11, 2013 at 16:49 | history | asked | Simon Martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |