Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack Exchange
Stack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack InternalSo we sayIf we takeuse a nice library like TetGen, generate a simple application-wrapper that simplifies our needs, and publish it as open source, can we use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product.?
Is itthis allowed by AGPL andthe GPL and AGPL licenses, or they do force all of a commercial product that consists of many such applications to be open source?
So we say we take a nice library like TetGen generate simple application-wrapper that simplifies our needs, publish it as open source, use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product.
Is it allowed by AGPL and GPL licenses or they do force all commercial product that consists of many such applications to be open source?
If we use a nice library like TetGen, generate a simple application-wrapper that simplifies our needs and publish it as open source, can we use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product?
Is this allowed by the GPL and AGPL licenses, or they do force all of a commercial product that consists of many such applications to be open source?
So we say we take a nice library alikelike TetGen generate simple application-wapperwrapper that simplifies our needs, publish it as opensourceopen source, use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product.
Is it allowed by AGPL and GPL licenses or they do force all commercial product that consists of many such applications to be opensourceopen source?
So we say we take a nice library alike TetGen generate simple application-wapper that simplifies our needs, publish it as opensource, use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product. Is it allowed by AGPL and GPL licenses or they do force all commercial product that consists of many such applications to be opensource?
So we say we take a nice library like TetGen generate simple application-wrapper that simplifies our needs, publish it as open source, use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product.
Is it allowed by AGPL and GPL licenses or they do force all commercial product that consists of many such applications to be open source?
So we say we teaketake a nice library alike TetGen generate simple application-wapper that simplifies our needs, publish it as opensource, use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product. Is it allowed by AGPL and GPL licenses or they do force all commercial product that consists of many such applications to be opensource?
So we say we teake a nice library alike TetGen generate simple application-wapper that simplifies our needs, publish it as opensource, use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product. Is it allowed by AGPL and GPL licenses or they do force all commercial product that consists of many such applications to be opensource?
So we say we take a nice library alike TetGen generate simple application-wapper that simplifies our needs, publish it as opensource, use it inside some Pipe/Chain of applications used in our commercial product. Is it allowed by AGPL and GPL licenses or they do force all commercial product that consists of many such applications to be opensource?
