Timeline for Using audit trail as time machine?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2014 at 17:48 | comment | added | Gudmundur Orn | Thanks @Clockwork-Muse, I have edited the answer to use exclusive upper-bound | |
| S Dec 15, 2014 at 17:47 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 | use exclusive end timestamp to avoid duplicate results |
| Dec 15, 2014 at 17:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 15, 2014 at 17:47 | |||||
| Dec 15, 2014 at 13:08 | comment | added | Clockwork-Muse | Um, no, don't use BETWEEN, use an exclusive upper-bound. What you're doing will include 2 rows in some cases. end is best thought of conceptually as null, which it should probably be stored as (although this would require additional checks). Note that ending values are always derived values. | |
| Dec 15, 2014 at 9:31 | vote | accept | David | ||
| Dec 15, 2014 at 9:04 | history | answered | Gudmundur Orn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |