Timeline for What does weak static typing/strong dynamic typing mean?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:52 | comment | added | David Raab | @Euphoric You basically agree with me. If the typing is gradiant you cannot label a language as "strong" or "weak" because those terms are absolute. If it is gradient at which point will it turn into strong and at which point will it turn into weak? And like i already mentioned. How do you measure it? If you think typing is gradiant (what i even showed) then using absolute terms like strong and weak makes no sense. We basically had to invent a strongness scale and saying F# has a strongness of 90 and C# of just 70. If you have that, you can sure say that F# is stronger than C#. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:41 | comment | added | Euphoric | I disagree on "strongness" being an absolute. I believe it is a gradient and that some languages being weaker or stronger than others is natural thing. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 9:55 | history | edited | David Raab | CC BY-SA 3.0 | corrected spelling, grammar and improved formatting |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 9:43 | history | edited | David Raab | CC BY-SA 3.0 | corrected spelling, grammar and improved formatting |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 9:18 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:25 | |||||
| Sep 19, 2015 at 9:15 | history | answered | David Raab | CC BY-SA 3.0 |