Timeline for Using a "strong" type system in the real world, say, for large-scale web-apps?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 21, 2018 at 8:53 | history | suggested | Pang | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Corrected spelling (ad → and, encoured → encountered, progammers → programmers, powerfull → powerful, metho → method, usefull → useful). Added a few punctuation marks. |
| Jun 21, 2018 at 2:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 21, 2018 at 8:53 | |||||
| Aug 27, 2016 at 8:15 | comment | added | Saurabh Nanda | @danilo2 sent again on your personal email ID. | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 17:41 | comment | added | danilo2 | @SaurabhNanda: I double checked our inbox and I dont see any message from you. Have you send it to contact <at> luna-lang.org? Please contact me directly writing to my wojciech <dot> danilo <at> gmail <dot> com and we will investigate what was the cause for this problem :) | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 10:03 | comment | added | Saurabh Nanda | @danilo2 Have sent an email to the contact@ address on your company website. Request you to respond. Thanks! | |
| Jul 20, 2016 at 10:29 | comment | added | sam boosalis | Gabriel Gonzales' blog is the best to start with. | |
| Mar 11, 2016 at 19:50 | history | edited | danilo2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 9 characters in body |
| Dec 21, 2015 at 14:20 | comment | added | MaiaVictor | I am probably one of the "Haskell" guys who hate types the most (so much I wrote my own version of Haskell without types, after all) - but for different reasons most people do. When it comes to software engineering, I, too, have that feeling that, when GHC is happy, your program just works. Haskell-like type systems are the ultimate tool not only for detecting humanish mistakes in programming, but for keeping huge codebases under your control. (I always remember Giovanni's justification to Mewtwo's armors whenever I have to fix type erros.) | |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 21:45 | history | edited | danilo2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 36 characters in body |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 18:59 | comment | added | Giorgio | "A lot of people tell, that if something compiles in Haskell, it just works and you should be pretty sure it will not blow in your face some day.": I have only used Haskell for small (even though non-trivial) projects, but I can confirm this: Once the Haskell compiler is satisfied I rarely find any bugs left. | |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 16:40 | history | edited | danilo2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 20 characters in body |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 14:24 | history | edited | danilo2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 809 characters in body |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 14:18 | history | answered | danilo2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |