Timeline for Redux memory consumption [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2016 at 15:41 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Nov 28, 2016 at 18:40 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 10:47 | history | closed | CommunityBot gbjbaanb Kilian Foth | Not suitable for this site | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 16:11 | history | edited | Stephen Isienyi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Modified the question to reflect that the question is about the overhead in memory consumption, and not simply a profiling question |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 15:55 | comment | added | Stephen Isienyi | Why should I profile it? To confirm the obvious? Is it not common sense that spawning a similar object over and over again incurs a serious overhead in terms of memory usage? @Dan's answer provides a way to minimize that overhead and that is the best answer so far. | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 5:25 | comment | added | user22815 | Have you profiled it? | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 2:31 | comment | added | user40980 | I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is asking for arbitrary memory profiling information. | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 20:32 | vote | accept | Stephen Isienyi | ||
| Feb 6, 2016 at 20:28 | history | edited | Stephen Isienyi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | corrected grammatical 3p plural present tense |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 18:47 | answer | added | Dan | timeline score: 31 | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 18:31 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 10:47 | |||||
| Feb 6, 2016 at 17:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 10:48 | |||||
| Feb 6, 2016 at 17:54 | history | asked | Stephen Isienyi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |