Timeline for Why isn't there a primitive "complex number" type in Java?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2017 at 2:04 | vote | accept | crow | ||
| May 13, 2017 at 17:40 | comment | added | Jörg W Mittag | @CodesInChaos: Value Types and primitives, yes. | |
| May 13, 2017 at 9:17 | comment | added | CodesInChaos | Do the planned value-type support also include support for value-types as generic arguments? | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/ | |
| May 25, 2016 at 16:55 | comment | added | Basilevs | Nice joke about tasteful SBT DSL | |
| Apr 5, 2016 at 14:40 | comment | added | Jörg W Mittag | @soandos: A guess. They were already talked about for Java 8, pushed from Java 9, but there are already quite a number of talks and papers about them, and Oracle seems seriously committed to them. Add one version just to be safe and you end up with Java 11. | |
| Apr 5, 2016 at 14:27 | comment | added | soandos | What is the source for the Java 11 reference? | |
| Apr 5, 2016 at 9:24 | comment | added | GordonM | It's not a proper programming language if it doesn't support imaginary numbers! | |
| Apr 5, 2016 at 7:16 | comment | added | Jules | "allow us to remove all 8 primitives ..." Not to mention the ugly string concatenation hack. | |
| Apr 5, 2016 at 0:12 | history | answered | Jörg W Mittag | CC BY-SA 3.0 |