Timeline for How many presenters should I use in proper MVP?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2017 at 23:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSoftEng/status/869692324707741697 | ||
| May 30, 2017 at 21:12 | vote | accept | Willi Mentzel | ||
| May 30, 2017 at 8:16 | comment | added | Alex | Tests are great for verifying functionality, not very good for evaluating non-functional qualities. Testability is one non-functional quality of a system, others can be stuff like performance, readability, scalability (in a bunch of different ways), extendability (in a bunch of different ways) etc. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 8:11 | comment | added | Willi Mentzel | @Alex: I see, but since I am starting with MVP and don't have proper experience with it, I would like to know what is good in the long run. Maybe I should just start writing tests, to see what works best. Because that is what it is mainly about: Testability, right? | |
| May 30, 2017 at 8:00 | comment | added | Alex | Proper this and propert that... Design patterns are great, but I think our whole community is a little bit too focused on what we call things and nitpicking on how things should look to be classified as some fancy acronym :) | |
| May 30, 2017 at 7:47 | comment | added | Willi Mentzel | @Alex: yes, that's true. But are both scenarios proper MVP, or did I make up something new? | |
| May 30, 2017 at 7:46 | history | edited | Willi Mentzel | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 234 characters in body; edited title |
| May 29, 2017 at 23:52 | answer | added | R Sahu | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 29, 2017 at 23:35 | history | edited | candied_orange | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited title |
| May 29, 2017 at 22:28 | comment | added | Alex | Well, you have yourself identified both relevant advantages and disadvantages. If you have those, it's obviously a matter of context and requirements. | |
| May 29, 2017 at 21:16 | history | asked | Willi Mentzel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |