Skip to main content
Software Engineering

Return to Answer

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
rob006
rob006
  • 156
  • 5

PHP does not have conceptsconcept of mixins, however it has traits which look like mix of traits and mixins from hack/scala:

  • Can define properties.
  • Can define constructors.
  • Can define abstract methods.
  • Does not support inheritance.
  • Traits are not types.

Are these definitions accurate for any OO language or just for the above mentioned ones ?

I don't think that there is even a single thing that will work in the same way in all OO languages. Even some basics like inheritance and interfaces have some variations, not mention more blurred constructs like traits/mixins.

PHP does not have concepts of mixins, however it has traits which look like mix of traits and mixins from hack/scala:

  • Can define properties.
  • Can define constructors.
  • Can define abstract methods.
  • Does not support inheritance.
  • Traits are not types.

Are these definitions accurate for any OO language or just for the above mentioned ones ?

I don't think that there is even a single thing that will work in the same way in all OO languages. Even some basics like inheritance and interfaces have some variations, not mention more blurred constructs like traits/mixins.

PHP does not have concept of mixins, however it has traits which look like mix of traits and mixins from hack/scala:

  • Can define properties.
  • Can define constructors.
  • Can define abstract methods.
  • Does not support inheritance.
  • Traits are not types.

Are these definitions accurate for any OO language or just for the above mentioned ones ?

I don't think that there is even a single thing that will work in the same way in all OO languages. Even some basics like inheritance and interfaces have some variations, not mention more blurred constructs like traits/mixins.

Source Link
rob006
rob006
  • 156
  • 5

PHP does not have concepts of mixins, however it has traits which look like mix of traits and mixins from hack/scala:

  • Can define properties.
  • Can define constructors.
  • Can define abstract methods.
  • Does not support inheritance.
  • Traits are not types.

Are these definitions accurate for any OO language or just for the above mentioned ones ?

I don't think that there is even a single thing that will work in the same way in all OO languages. Even some basics like inheritance and interfaces have some variations, not mention more blurred constructs like traits/mixins.