Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Dec 2, 2019 at 14:12 history suggested Robert Houghton CC BY-SA 4.0
Cleaned up language
Nov 30, 2019 at 2:48 review Suggested edits
S Dec 2, 2019 at 14:12
Nov 12, 2019 at 21:48 audit First posts
Nov 12, 2019 at 21:48
Nov 4, 2019 at 16:18 comment added Andrew Says you. Speak for yourself!
S Nov 2, 2019 at 18:18 history suggested Kyle McVay CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixed misspelling, minor grammar change
Nov 2, 2019 at 15:37 comment added R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE And if a "debugger" can be interpreted as "human who does the debugging"... ;-)
Nov 2, 2019 at 15:35 comment added R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE Indeed I think the answer to this question depends on what constitutes a debugger. Clearly debuggers are not needed at all if you only classify general-purpose debugging tools designed for use with arbitrary programs a debuggers; it's perfectly possible to develop and debug entirely with "printf debugging" or blinking LEDs or whatever.
Nov 1, 2019 at 19:25 comment added Robert Harvey The OP focuses on the debugger specifically, and doesn't specifically exclude those other forms of debugging except by not mentioning them.
Nov 1, 2019 at 19:20 comment added whatsisname @RobertHarvey: if you don't get it right the first time, how are you going to fix it? Not all bugs can be figured out solely through integration testing. The OPs language doesn't just exclude debuggers like gdb, but debuggers in the abstract such as printf logging or blinking leds.
Nov 1, 2019 at 17:32 comment added Robert Harvey It's possible to write bug-free code without using a debugger. I don't think anyone's making the assertion that it can always be done bug free the first time.
Nov 1, 2019 at 17:26 review Suggested edits
S Nov 2, 2019 at 18:18
Nov 1, 2019 at 17:21 history answered whatsisname CC BY-SA 4.0