Timeline for Is Language-Oriented Programming practical?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2016 at 15:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackProgrammer/status/780072348498194432 | ||
| Sep 12, 2016 at 20:18 | answer | added | Kakungulu | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 20:43 | history | edited | gnat | http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/7285/structured-tag-cleanup-initiative-phase-ii | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 17:52 | vote | accept | Michael K | ||
| Aug 18, 2011 at 20:20 | history | edited | Michael K | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1 characters in body |
| Feb 24, 2011 at 15:39 | answer | added | Mike Dunlavey | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 22:35 | comment | added | glenatron | I would find it more useful to master Lisp than to master Cobol. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 20:27 | comment | added | Matthieu M. | There is a difference between a widely used language and a useful one. A language that explores new areas is generally not used, but may contribute to all in the long term. On the other hand, Java is useless, since it doesn't bring anything new to the table (even though it's definitely a successful language by all accounts). | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 19:54 | comment | added | mouviciel | Lisp is a wonderful language. But nobody uses it except some Emacs gurus. Even AI experts use C and C++. Even Cobol is more useful today. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 17:01 | answer | added | glenatron | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:39 | answer | added | SK-logic | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:33 | comment | added | Frank Shearar | @mouviciel it depends a whole lot on what exactly you mean by "successful". Is it used by the majority of programmers? No. Has it been around, in use, a long time? Yes - 50 years and counting. Have most modern languages stolen a whole pile of useful features from it? Yes. (Can languages steal even more from the Lisp languages? Yes!) | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:04 | history | edited | Michael K | CC BY-SA 2.5 | added 7 characters in body |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:04 | comment | added | Michael K | @mouviciel: I don't claim that it is. I only state that it provides that functionality I describe. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 16:01 | comment | added | mouviciel | It is not clear to me what problem this paradigm solves. By the way, LISP is not an example of a successful language. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 15:59 | answer | added | Nerian | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 15:57 | comment | added | user7043 | It sure has a huge mind blowing potential. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 15:49 | history | asked | Michael K | CC BY-SA 2.5 |