Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author | user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score | score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers | answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections | title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status | closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types | is:question is:answer |
| Exclude | -[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with asynchronous-programming
Search options not deleted user 5146
21 votes
Expensive constructors. Should they exist? Should they be replaced?
This is very similar to an ancient StackOverflow question. I suggest reading my answer there, as it hasn't changed. Arguing that the constructor must not be slow is a mindset that comes from real-time …
- 1,988