Timeline for Will the new SharePoint FrameWork increase speed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2018 at 14:19 | history | edited | Ali Jafer | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1148 characters in body |
| Aug 3, 2017 at 11:29 | comment | added | Robin Güldenpfennig | The MVP is talking poop. SPFx won't optimize any "simple" REST calls. How should it do that? So it doesn't matter what kind of framework you use, as long as you have control on how the REST calls are build up. | |
| Jun 4, 2017 at 8:04 | vote | accept | Danny '365CSI' Engelman | ||
| S May 8, 2017 at 23:38 | history | suggested | user34941 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | corrected spelling throughout |
| May 8, 2017 at 22:28 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 8, 2017 at 23:38 | |||||
| Feb 1, 2017 at 9:33 | history | edited | Ali Jafer | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 929 characters in body |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 14:45 | comment | added | Danny '365CSI' Engelman | Would love to be able to Thumbs-Up your last sentence... Oh.. there are days when I long back to my good old Lotus Notes years.. at least that Distributed Cloud Stuff worked.... in 1997... | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 14:40 | history | edited | Ali Jafer | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 638 characters in body |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 14:27 | history | edited | Ali Jafer | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 638 characters in body |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 13:19 | comment | added | Danny '365CSI' Engelman | I have used SPFx, and contributed to PnPCoreJS. My question is: When an MVPs says SPFx is going to increase performance (to the same endpoints), is he talking poop or not? What Front-End technology is used has nothing to do with this. IMHO The only way that SPFx can be faster is IF it is going to call different endpoints (we know Microsoft traces everything by request-header; so it is theoretically possible to redirect incoming API calls to other servers/technologies.. actually I wouldn't be surprised at all if Microsoft did that for their own calls) | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 12:44 | comment | added | Gautam Sheth | I believe one aspect of the question is how is a simple jquery/javascript ajax call made in a script editor webpart different from a call you make using spfx webpart ? | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 12:31 | comment | added | Ali Jafer | SPFx would improve speeds. Have you tried to run the rest call on its own to see how quick it loads in browser? SPFx with typescript coupled with angular or knockout seems to be getting traction and considering you can get an IDE for visual studios is a bonus. | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 12:12 | comment | added | Danny '365CSI' Engelman | I corrected it in my explanation. This is SPOnline. Coming from a (Gopher) Front-End background I have applied all the usual optimizations (including putting standard images Base64 encoded in HTML source files) My question is (because Clients listen to MVPs and now think I am the old geezer) ► Is SPFx going to increase these access times? | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 11:42 | history | edited | Ali Jafer | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 842 characters in body |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 11:22 | history | answered | Ali Jafer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |