Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • After playing around with it I had the same thought about tying up the workflow. Adding the parallel task also made the WF much more complicated. I just wasn't sure if throwing two workflows on the same content type was recommended. Thanks! Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 16:12
  • You're welcome! Also, if something goes wrong or you miss something, you don't need to redeploy a massive workflow again, you can just open the workflow with the flaw. Cheers! Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 16:24