Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 17:21 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 17:21 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
Nov 7, 2016 at 8:35 history edited gnat
edited tags
Nov 25, 2015 at 20:50 review Close votes
Nov 30, 2015 at 3:08
Nov 25, 2015 at 20:30 comment added gnat Possible duplicate of Merge and replace custom close reason
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:30 history edited CommunityBot
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Apr 23, 2014 at 9:14 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Jul 8, 2013 at 3:05 history edited yannisMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 394 characters in body; edited tags
Jul 3, 2013 at 20:06 answer added Aaron Kurtzhals timeline score: 0
Jun 28, 2013 at 19:28 answer added Robert Harvey timeline score: 5
Jun 26, 2013 at 23:01 answer added Jimmy Hoffa timeline score: 4
Jun 26, 2013 at 7:58 comment added yannis Mod @JimmyHoffa Moderators can update the close reasons, we can add/edit/remove/sort them at any time. There's a fixed limit of 3 custom reasons, so the list won't get long (unless we explicitly ask for it to be longer). The reasons we have now were picked by SE, mostly for the feature to not roll out empty.
Jun 26, 2013 at 7:56 comment added Jimmy Hoffa I see the close reasons have changed now, but none of these are there; rather we have 5 off-topic choices already... Did the decision happen that we don't get to choose our off-topic reasons after all? Or are these going to be added later, at which point, we're going to have a huge amount of off-topic choices... could be a bit cumbersome/annoying
Jun 25, 2013 at 18:09 comment added yannis Mod @AaronKurtzhals Unfortunately no. This was a bit of a controversial decision, and SE said they'll keep an eye on off topic closures and might reconsider if there's a clear need for a generic off topic. There's a feature request asking for a mod only generic off topic (mod only because a user one had already been declined) but I can't say I'm optimistic about it.
Jun 25, 2013 at 18:03 comment added Aaron Kurtzhals Is there still going to be a generic off-topic reason for questions that are blatantly off topic such as "How do I change the oil on my car?"
Jun 25, 2013 at 17:52 answer added Aaron Kurtzhals timeline score: 0
Jun 25, 2013 at 13:04 answer added user53019 timeline score: 4
Jun 25, 2013 at 13:01 answer added user53019 timeline score: 5
Jun 25, 2013 at 11:57 comment added yannis Mod @BartvanIngenSchenau No, those will be the same as they are today. The screenshot doesn't have migration targets because MSO doesn't have any.
Jun 25, 2013 at 11:53 comment added Bart van Ingen Schenau Do we also have to provide "off-topic reasons" for migration targets (such as migration to SO for code questions), or will those be added automatically to the list?
Jun 24, 2013 at 15:22 answer added Jimmy Hoffa timeline score: 3
Jun 24, 2013 at 15:15 answer added Jimmy Hoffa timeline score: 3
Jun 24, 2013 at 14:23 answer added Jimmy Hoffa timeline score: 2
Jun 24, 2013 at 11:31 history edited yannisMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 140 characters in body
Jun 24, 2013 at 11:30 answer added user53019 timeline score: 8
Jun 24, 2013 at 11:28 answer added user53019 timeline score: 7
Jun 24, 2013 at 11:08 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/349121784534167552
Jun 24, 2013 at 5:44 comment added gnat per recent discussion at MSO, looks like we have like seven: 1) "Workplace" 2) "Stack Overflow" 3) "learn next" 4) "do next" 5) "read next" 6) "career advice" 7) "non-programming activities". These are explicitly listed in "not about..." section of Help Center > Asking
Jun 24, 2013 at 3:34 history edited yannisMod
edited tags
Jun 24, 2013 at 2:46 history asked yannisMod CC BY-SA 3.0