Is there evidence that some software development best practices depend on programming skill level? I mean, these methods are good, but maybe the way the are used or the extent might vary?

This question arose after I read Paul Graham's commentary about OOP, and the last bullet point of this accepted answer. It proposes that where, how, and how much to use unit tests might depend on your programming skill.

So do top programmers use different approaches than average programmers?

Is there evidence that some software development best practices depend on programming skill level? I mean, these methods are good, but maybe the way the are used or the extent might vary?

This question arose after I read Paul Graham's commentary about OOP, and the last bullet point of this accepted answer. It proposes that where, how, and how much to use unit tests might depend on your programming skill.

So do top programmers use different approaches than average programmers?

Is there evidence that some methods recommended for software development depend on programming skill level. I mean these methods are good, but maybe the way the are used or the extent might vary?

This question arised after I had read the (fanatic?) comment of Paul Graham about OOP (http://www.paulgraham.com/noop.html), and also the last bullet point of the accepted answer in http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/99370/how-much-time-do-you-spend-on-unit-testing. It proposes that where, how and how much to use unit tests might depend on your programming skill and way.

So do top programmers use other approaches than average programmers?

Is there evidence that some software development best practices depend on programming skill level? I mean, these methods are good, but maybe the way the are used or the extent might vary?

This question arose after I read Paul Graham's commentary about OOP, and the last bullet point of this accepted answer. It proposes that where, how, and how much to use unit tests might depend on your programming skill.

So do top programmers use different approaches than average programmers?

Is there evidence that some methods recommended for software development depend on programming skill level. I mean these methods are good, but maybe the way the are used or the extent might vary?

This question arised after I had read the (fanatic?) comment of Paul Graham about OOP (http://www.paulgraham.com/noop.html), and also the last bullet point of the accepted answer in http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/99370/how-much-time-do-you-spend-on-unit-testing. It proposes that where, how and how much to use unit tests might depend on your programming skill and way.

So do top programmers use other approaches than average programmers?

Is there evidence that some methods recommended for software development depend on programming skill level. I mean these methods are good, but maybe the way the are used or the extent might vary?

This question arised after I had read the (fanatic?) comment of Paul Graham about OOP (http://www.paulgraham.com/noop.html), and also the last bullet point of the accepted answer in http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/99370/how-much-time-do-you-spend-on-unit-testing. It proposes that where, how and how much to use unit tests might depend on your programming skill and way.

So do top programmers use other approaches than average programmers?