Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    +1. Legacy Silverlight sites, of course, get no consideration at all. Commented May 10, 2013 at 16:22
  • Also HTML5 is not ready yet consistently whereas Flash is mature. Commented May 10, 2013 at 16:43
  • If this is for backward compatibility, why isn't Microsoft own Silverlight allowed? Commented May 11, 2013 at 11:50
  • There are obviously other factors that go into it, but if you think about the amount of Flash on the web vs Silverlight on the web, it's a pretty massive gap. I don't work for Microsoft, and wasn't in the conversations, but install base is definitely a factor. Also, this is just in the touch mode of the browser. If you have to have Silverlight support, you can always drop back to desktop mode, which still has all the touch support enabled, it just doesn't have all the touch-centric chrome, at least in the Pro version (don't have an RT device to double check myself for that version, though). Commented May 11, 2013 at 14:29