Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • What do you mean by "hypocritical?" Commented Dec 5, 2013 at 22:07
  • That might not be the best word choice. I wanted to express that it's not okay to tell the "community edition" developers that their contributions MUST be GPL and not adhere to that policy yourself. Commented Dec 5, 2013 at 22:12
  • 7
    They said it better than I could... They own the copyright; they can license it any way they wish. Commented Dec 5, 2013 at 22:14
  • Related: programmers.stackexchange.com/q/30856/2406. Commented Dec 5, 2013 at 23:41
  • 2
    More to the point, if I own the copyright to some work, I can license it to one person with one license and to another person with another license. This assumes I own the actual copyright to that work. If I just have a license to someone else's work (say under GPL) I can only pass it on to others as my license allows. As long as CFEngine is wholly owned by one creator, and doesn't depend on any work they have under GPL from someone else, they are entirely free to offer different licenses to different people Commented Dec 6, 2013 at 0:35