Timeline for Is the Entity Component System architecture object oriented by definition?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| Mar 17, 2020 at 19:02 | comment | added | rsenna | @Jean-MichaëlCelerier It's been 4 years, so I'm late. Still, even though I agree with the spirit of what you tried to say (something like "you should not have a dogmatic view of what OOP means", which I totally agree), I must say that one of the academia's multiple and fundamental roles is precisely to provide clear and formal definitions. That's far from "useless" in my book. | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 13:11 | comment | added | Jean-Michaël Celerier | "while OOP is about the opposite" There is no accepted definition of what OOP is about, unless useless academic definitions such as SmallTalk's which never gets used in practice. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 13:04 | comment | added | user166631 | This is the correct answer. ECS doesn't fit very well with OOP paradigms, because ECS is all about separating data and behavior, while OOP is about the opposite. | |
| Apr 19, 2015 at 2:04 | history | edited | pup | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 129 characters in body |
| Apr 19, 2015 at 0:25 | history | answered | pup | CC BY-SA 3.0 |