Skip to main content
Software Engineering

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    Yes, the buyer could get crap, or he could get good quality code too. I just checked code canyon, the top sellers there seem to have thousands of sales. Actually, if they put out crap, then they'd get a bad name, so it is in their own interest to put up good code (at least "working correctly" type of code, if not "most efficient" type). So it does seem to be working. Commented Feb 8, 2011 at 16:21
  • I am one of the co-founders at Binpress, and I agree with your concern regarding random snippets of code. For that reason we manually review and approve every package that is published on our site to make sure it complies with coding conventions and standards and that it actually works. We also give a 14 day money-back guarantee buyers who are not satisfied with the package they purchased. Commented Feb 18, 2011 at 8:18
  • @Eran Galperin - Now that is interesting. Do you have any links/references regarding your standards? Commented Feb 18, 2011 at 17:18
  • we have a page detailing the general submissions criteria for packages on our service at binpress.com/page/publishing-components . We will be adding individual pages for each language with resources to the specific standards for each language. Commented Feb 24, 2011 at 4:38
  • 2
    I can confirm what Eran writes. Recently I have published one of my scripts on Binpress. The first time I got list of things to fix :). Next fixed version was approved. Plus I get some good advice. I have to try now also Code Canyon. Commented Apr 14, 2011 at 8:50