Timeline for Is there an open source license for this?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2011 at 9:02 | comment | added | Jan Hudec | @Philip: I am not a lawyer, but I think you don't really have to distribute the MIT license with binaries linked to the application, because you can sublicense them under the license covering the application (which does have to be there anyway). | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 19:38 | comment | added | Shauna | Distributing the license is kind of required for any license because people have to actually be aware of said license and its contents. It kind of defeats the purpose of the license to begin with if no one has access to it. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 19:27 | comment | added | Philip | MIT, BSD and GPL which I've looked at all require distributing the license with the source or binaries. I want to be as little restrictive as possible. Now of course a company could be sued if they distributed software using this code and someone died because of it. I just want to minimize the chance of someone claiming the code is their own and suing others who use it. | |
| Jul 13, 2011 at 19:22 | history | answered | Shauna | CC BY-SA 3.0 |