You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr (24) | May (14) | Jun (29) | Jul (33) | Aug (3) | Sep (8) | Oct (18) | Nov (1) | Dec (10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Jan (3) | Feb (33) | Mar (7) | Apr (28) | May (30) | Jun (5) | Jul (10) | Aug (7) | Sep (32) | Oct (41) | Nov (20) | Dec (10) |
| 2004 | Jan (24) | Feb (18) | Mar (57) | Apr (40) | May (55) | Jun (48) | Jul (77) | Aug (15) | Sep (56) | Oct (80) | Nov (74) | Dec (52) |
| 2005 | Jan (38) | Feb (42) | Mar (39) | Apr (56) | May (79) | Jun (73) | Jul (16) | Aug (23) | Sep (68) | Oct (77) | Nov (52) | Dec (27) |
| 2006 | Jan (27) | Feb (18) | Mar (51) | Apr (62) | May (28) | Jun (50) | Jul (36) | Aug (33) | Sep (47) | Oct (50) | Nov (77) | Dec (13) |
| 2007 | Jan (15) | Feb (8) | Mar (14) | Apr (18) | May (25) | Jun (16) | Jul (16) | Aug (19) | Sep (32) | Oct (17) | Nov (5) | Dec (5) |
| 2008 | Jan (64) | Feb (25) | Mar (25) | Apr (6) | May (28) | Jun (20) | Jul (10) | Aug (27) | Sep (28) | Oct (59) | Nov (37) | Dec (43) |
| 2009 | Jan (40) | Feb (25) | Mar (12) | Apr (57) | May (46) | Jun (29) | Jul (39) | Aug (10) | Sep (20) | Oct (42) | Nov (50) | Dec (57) |
| 2010 | Jan (82) | Feb (165) | Mar (256) | Apr (260) | May (36) | Jun (87) | Jul (53) | Aug (89) | Sep (107) | Oct (51) | Nov (88) | Dec (117) |
| 2011 | Jan (69) | Feb (60) | Mar (113) | Apr (71) | May (67) | Jun (90) | Jul (88) | Aug (90) | Sep (48) | Oct (64) | Nov (69) | Dec (118) |
| 2012 | Jan (49) | Feb (528) | Mar (351) | Apr (190) | May (238) | Jun (193) | Jul (104) | Aug (100) | Sep (57) | Oct (41) | Nov (47) | Dec (51) |
| 2013 | Jan (94) | Feb (57) | Mar (96) | Apr (105) | May (77) | Jun (102) | Jul (27) | Aug (81) | Sep (32) | Oct (53) | Nov (127) | Dec (65) |
| 2014 | Jan (113) | Feb (59) | Mar (104) | Apr (259) | May (70) | Jun (70) | Jul (146) | Aug (45) | Sep (58) | Oct (149) | Nov (77) | Dec (83) |
| 2015 | Jan (53) | Feb (66) | Mar (86) | Apr (50) | May (135) | Jun (76) | Jul (151) | Aug (83) | Sep (97) | Oct (262) | Nov (245) | Dec (231) |
| 2016 | Jan (131) | Feb (233) | Mar (97) | Apr (138) | May (221) | Jun (254) | Jul (92) | Aug (248) | Sep (168) | Oct (275) | Nov (477) | Dec (445) |
| 2017 | Jan (218) | Feb (217) | Mar (146) | Apr (172) | May (216) | Jun (252) | Jul (164) | Aug (192) | Sep (190) | Oct (143) | Nov (255) | Dec (182) |
| 2018 | Jan (295) | Feb (164) | Mar (113) | Apr (147) | May (64) | Jun (262) | Jul (184) | Aug (90) | Sep (69) | Oct (364) | Nov (102) | Dec (101) |
| 2019 | Jan (119) | Feb (64) | Mar (64) | Apr (102) | May (57) | Jun (154) | Jul (84) | Aug (81) | Sep (76) | Oct (102) | Nov (233) | Dec (89) |
| 2020 | Jan (38) | Feb (170) | Mar (155) | Apr (172) | May (120) | Jun (223) | Jul (461) | Aug (227) | Sep (268) | Oct (113) | Nov (56) | Dec (124) |
| 2021 | Jan (121) | Feb (48) | Mar (334) | Apr (345) | May (207) | Jun (136) | Jul (71) | Aug (112) | Sep (122) | Oct (173) | Nov (184) | Dec (223) |
| 2022 | Jan (197) | Feb (206) | Mar (156) | Apr (212) | May (192) | Jun (170) | Jul (143) | Aug (380) | Sep (182) | Oct (148) | Nov (128) | Dec (269) |
| 2023 | Jan (248) | Feb (196) | Mar (264) | Apr (36) | May (123) | Jun (66) | Jul (120) | Aug (48) | Sep (157) | Oct (198) | Nov (300) | Dec (273) |
| 2024 | Jan (271) | Feb (147) | Mar (207) | Apr (78) | May (107) | Jun (168) | Jul (151) | Aug (51) | Sep (438) | Oct (221) | Nov (302) | Dec (357) |
| 2025 | Jan (451) | Feb (219) | Mar (326) | Apr (232) | May (306) | Jun (181) | Jul (452) | Aug (282) | Sep (620) | Oct (793) | Nov (682) | Dec |
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 4 | 5 | 6 (1) | 7 | 8 (1) | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 (3) | 13 (3) | 14 (1) | 15 | 16 | 17 (1) |
| 18 | 19 | 20 (4) | 21 (3) | 22 (2) | 23 (2) | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 (11) | 28 (1) | 29 (7) | 30 | 31 |
| From: István S. <le...@gm...> - 2009-01-21 18:25:51 |
Thanks a million I am going to check it soon. Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:08 PM, James Yonan <ji...@yo...> wrote: > I've patched the NSIS installer to omit the Windows version check. > > Try this installer: > > http://openvpn.net/beta/openvpn-2.1_rc15e-install.exe > > James > > István Szukács wrote: > >> Hi folks! >> >> >> I am wondering if you have ever had success to run openvpn on windows 7. >> The problem is the latest installer( >> http://openvpn.net/release/openvpn-2.1_rc15-install.exe) says this >> version is not supporting windows.... I try to install >> http://openvpn.se/files/install_packages/openvpn-2.0.9-gui-1.0.3-install.exe, >> works fine except the fact that the tap driver is not signed and because of >> this it remains disabled and you cannot use openvpn(but runs well up to the >> point when initialize the driver). >> >> If you could point me a doc how to make it run on win7 it would be much >> appreciated. If I could help with anything the win7 build let me know.... >> >> >> Regards, >> Istvan >> >> >> -- >> the sun shines for all >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: >> SourcForge Community >> SourceForge wants to tell your story. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openvpn-devel mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel >> > -- the sun shines for all |
| From: James Y. <ji...@yo...> - 2009-01-21 17:08:37 |
I've patched the NSIS installer to omit the Windows version check. Try this installer: http://openvpn.net/beta/openvpn-2.1_rc15e-install.exe James István Szukács wrote: > Hi folks! > > > I am wondering if you have ever had success to run openvpn on windows 7. > The problem is the latest > installer(http://openvpn.net/release/openvpn-2.1_rc15-install.exe) says > this version is not supporting windows.... I try to install > http://openvpn.se/files/install_packages/openvpn-2.0.9-gui-1.0.3-install.exe, > works fine except the fact that the tap driver is not signed and because > of this it remains disabled and you cannot use openvpn(but runs well up > to the point when initialize the driver). > > If you could point me a doc how to make it run on win7 it would be much > appreciated. If I could help with anything the win7 build let me know.... > > > Regards, > Istvan > > > -- > the sun shines for all > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel |
| From: Robert F. <rf...@be...> - 2009-01-21 15:15:13 |
Hi, We are using multiple remote parameters in order to switch to a second OpenVPN instance in case the first one isn't reachable: remote server1 8080 tcp remote server1 1194 udp By using just one of the above mentioned remote paramters everything works perfectly. However while testing the connection with the above order of remote parameters and blocking access to tcp/8080 the following happens: - OpenVPN tries to connect to server1:8080 via TCP which fails (as expected) - after a few seconds OpenVPN tries to connect to server1:1194 via UDP (as expected) - the OpenVPN connection is established sucessfully, the remote network is reachable, everything works just fine. - after a little while (a few seconds to about one minute) the message Authenticate/Decrypt packet error: bad packet ID (may be a replay): [ #<number> ] appears and the tunnel stops working. This strange error happens reproducible if both remote directives are used, using just one _never_ caused any problems. Further details: - the client (Windows XP SP3) is using OpenVPN version 2.1_rc15 downloaded from openvpn.net - the server (Linux 2.6.22) is using OpenVPN version 2.0.6. - the server is configured with 2 OpenVPN instances, one listening at the respective TCP/UDP ports, so the only difference between the two server instances is the port, proto and server and status parameter. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Server configuration: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ local <ip address> port 1194 proto udp dev tap ca ca.pem cert certs/CServer.pem key keys/KServer.pem crl-verify crl/crl.pem tls-auth ta.key 0 comp-lzo dh dh2048.pem server 10.162.0.0 255.255.0.0 keepalive 5 60 tun-mtu 1500 tun-mtu-extra 32 mssfix 1450 max-clients 100 user nobody group nogroup persist-key persist-tun status /etc/openvpn/status.log 1 verb 3 push "dhcp-option DNS <dns ip address>" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Client configuration: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ client dev tap remote server1 8080 tcp remote server1 1194 udp tls-client tls-remote <remote CN> ca ca.pem cert cert.pem key key.pem tls-auth ta.key 1 redirect-gateway ns-cert-type server comp-lzo tun-mtu 1500 tun-mtu-extra 32 mssfix 1450 verb 3 route-method exe route-delay 2 So my question would be if there are any known issues using multiple remote statements (or the recently introduced "<connection>" blocks - for which the same problem occurs). Searching through the mailing list showed nothing related. If you need any further details or debugging output, please let me know. Thanks in advance, Robert mit freundlichen Grüßen Robert Fischer |