Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Rev

1

nice indeed! esp leveraging the precondition opening-braces >= closing-braces.

aleemb
– aleemb

2009-04-08 13:36:10 +00:00
Commented Apr 8, 2009 at 13:36
1

@Prabhu Jayaraman - with which input will it produce invalid pairs ? The conditions restrict it to never add a closing bracket if there are not already opening brackets, so I do not think you are correct.

markt
– markt

2010-08-06 15:17:54 +00:00
Commented Aug 6, 2010 at 15:17
1

@Prabhu Jayaraman - why ? Please give me an example input that produces incorrect results.

markt
– markt

2010-08-06 15:46:57 +00:00
Commented Aug 6, 2010 at 15:46
OOps very sorry markt. wrong judgement. i thought close<pairs +1

josh
– josh

2010-08-06 17:16:05 +00:00
Commented Aug 6, 2010 at 17:16
1

Very elegant solution.. you nailed recursion!

satyajit
– satyajit

2010-09-11 05:37:19 +00:00
Commented Sep 11, 2010 at 5:37

| Show 5 more comments

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow