Skip to main content
Cross Validated

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

10
  • $\begingroup$ Smaller is better in the R representation, yes? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 17:06
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply. I found that the difference in AIC between the two models is only 2. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 17:08
  • $\begingroup$ The smaller model has a slightly larger AIC and BIC AIC: large-small AIC= -2 BIC: large-small BIC- 7.8 $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 17:20
  • $\begingroup$ Aaron.. oops... lower, fixed... $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2011 at 20:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just to clear something up, this additional term is just another covariate, and there is very little collinearity. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 29, 2011 at 18:42