Timeline for Evaluation of log Vs. non log models
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 1:47 | comment | added | Doug Fir | @TheLaconic thanks! The responses I have got on here, including yours, have helped me understand | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 1:45 | comment | added | The Laconic | See my recent edit. I think I was wrong. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 1:45 | comment | added | Doug Fir | @TheLaconic thanks for contributing to the discussion. You don't see the relevance of cross-validation here. OK. But I was not sure. That's why I asked a question on this q&a site... out of lack of understanding! | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 1:41 | comment | added | The Laconic | I don't see the relevance of cross-validation here in particular. The idea is that you have to compare apples to apples, whatever your metric. This is conceptually distinct from the process of comparing the performance of two models on test data. Edit: I take that back. I can see that performance on test data is important here, since one model could be directly optimizing the performance measure in-sample, while the other wouldn't. But it does still have to be apples-to-apples. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 1:37 | comment | added | The Laconic | I noticed that too, @mdewey. I've upvoted this question out of counter-spite. | |
| Apr 8, 2017 at 23:32 | vote | accept | Doug Fir | ||
| Apr 8, 2017 at 21:34 | answer | added | usεr11852 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 8, 2017 at 12:56 | comment | added | mdewey | I think there is a random down-voter at large. Sadly I cannot answer this question though but it seems useful so I up-voted it. Hope an expert passes by. | |
| Apr 8, 2017 at 10:21 | comment | added | Doug Fir | If down voting can you let me know how to improve the question. Thanks | |
| Apr 8, 2017 at 9:18 | history | asked | Doug Fir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |