Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Duplicate" by Harvey Motulsky, User1865345, whuber
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link

What would be the analog of the "rule of three", but for a 99% confidence interval?

I.e., how to estimate, with the 99% confidence, the rate of occurrences in the population after looking at a sample with n subjects which didn't happenhave the given event occurring?

What would be the analog of the "rule of three", but for a 99% confidence interval?

I.e., how to estimate, with the 99% confidence, the rate of occurrences in the population after looking at a sample with n subjects which didn't happen the given event occurring?

What would be the analog of the "rule of three", but for a 99% confidence interval?

I.e., how to estimate, with the 99% confidence, the rate of occurrences in the population after looking at a sample with n subjects which didn't have the given event occurring?

added 47 characters in body
Source Link

What would be the analog of the "rule of three", but for a 99% confidence interval?

I.e., how to estimate, with the 99% confidence, the rate of occurrences in the population after looking at a sample with n subjects, with which didn't happen the 99% confidencegiven event occurring?

What would be the analog of the "rule of three", but for a 99% confidence interval?

I.e., how to estimate the rate of occurrences in the population after looking at a sample with n subjects, with the 99% confidence?

What would be the analog of the "rule of three", but for a 99% confidence interval?

I.e., how to estimate, with the 99% confidence, the rate of occurrences in the population after looking at a sample with n subjects which didn't happen the given event occurring?

Source Link

Equivalent of "rule of three" for 99% confidence?

What would be the analog of the "rule of three", but for a 99% confidence interval?

I.e., how to estimate the rate of occurrences in the population after looking at a sample with n subjects, with the 99% confidence?